Lifetime Value (LTV) is a metric that reflects how much profit a company earns from a single customer over the entire period of their interaction with the brand (throughout their “lifetime” in your business).
This is a predictive metric built on historical averages, so it does not guarantee an exact result — but it serves as a benchmark. With it, a business can estimate the real value of its customer base and understand which acquisition channels bring in more valuable customers. This makes it possible to allocate marketing budgets more thoughtfully, plan retention strategies, and make data-driven growth decisions.
In other words, in marketing, LTV is used as a guideline: if you know how much a customer brings in on average, you can understand how much it’s worth investing in acquiring them.
In the list below, you’ll see five metrics, but not all of them are used at the same time. That’s because LTV is an approximate metric, and digital marketers and analysts use different formulas depending on the type of business, available data, and the level of analytics resources. That’s why there are several approaches to calculating it.
In this article, we’ll look at two of the most common approaches: a simple formula (relevant for e-commerce and non-subscription services) and a classic formula (for subscription models such as SaaS or EdTech).
For the simple formula you need:
For the classic formula:
If, for example, ARPU is calculated monthly and Churn Rate is calculated yearly, the formula will produce an incorrect result. All metrics in the formula must be within the same period (monthly, quarterly, or yearly).
Sometimes LTV is compared using a customer’s current value regardless of how long they’ve already been with the company. But it’s more accurate to evaluate LTV within the same time frame from the first purchase (for example, 30, 90, or 365 days). This enables a fair comparison of new and long-term customers and helps avoid distortions.
This problem occurs when Lifetime is calculated using limited or early data and then automatically projected into the future. This is especially risky in businesses with unstable churn: numbers from the first months may not reflect the real situation. To avoid this, it’s worth recalculating LTV from time to time using updated data.
An overall average across the entire customer base hides differences between segments. Customers from different channels or regions may have different value, so it’s better to calculate LTV separately for key segments.
LTV is a dynamic metric. It changes along with pricing, the product, and customer behavior. It should be updated regularly (for example, quarterly) so decisions remain relevant.
Different customer segments may have different churn. For example, new users often leave faster than those who have been with the company for several months. If you use one averaged Churn Rate for everyone, LTV may be inaccurate.
Margin shows what portion of revenue remains for the business after covering direct costs of producing or delivering the product. Basic formulas don’t account for this, and for most marketing tasks that’s sufficient. But if the goal is more complex — for example, detailed financial analysis or calculations for investors — it’s worth adding a Gross Margin coefficient to estimate the customer’s actual profitability.
LTV is a useful metric for evaluating customer value and planning marketing investments, but it remains a forecast built on historical averages. Treating LTV as the only and error-free benchmark is a mistake.
This calculation method works for non-subscription businesses where customers make purchases from time to time — for example, online stores, one-time order services, or offline retail. In such cases, it’s difficult to determine the exact moment a customer has permanently “left,” so a simplified approach is used without churn rate, focusing on average order value, purchase frequency, and an approximate interaction duration.
LTV = AOV × PF × Lifetime
Or, simplified, the formula looks like this:
LTV = Average order value × Number of orders per year/x months × Customer lifetime in years/months
Imagine a home goods online store where the average order value is $40, customers make 2 purchases per year on average, and the average customer “lifecycle” is 3 years. In that case, the calculation looks like this: LTV = 40 × 2 × 3 = $240
In this example, $240 is the approximate total revenue one customer will bring to the business over the entire relationship. Knowing this value helps you make more informed marketing decisions: for example, how much you can spend at most to acquire one customer (CAC) to keep the investment profitable, or how increasing average order value or purchase frequency will affect long-term revenue.
This method is more suitable for subscription-based businesses (SaaS, online services, EdTech, etc.), where it’s easier to track how long a customer “lives” in the system — because once they cancel their subscription, it becomes clear the interaction has ended.
LTV = ARPU / Churn Rate
Imagine you have an EdTech platform with a paid subscription. The average user brings you $10 per month — that’s ARPU (Average Revenue Per User). The monthly churn rate is 5%, or 0.05 in decimal form. Then LTV = $10 / 0.05 = $200
So, each user generates $200 in revenue on average over the entire period of interaction with the service. Understanding this number helps you determine the maximum customer acquisition cost (CAC) you can afford while keeping the investment profitable, and also forecast how much revenue a certain number of new subscribers will generate.
On its own, LTV does not tell you whether acquiring customers is profitable. Its value becomes clear when compared to customer acquisition cost (CAC — Customer Acquisition Cost).
There is a generally accepted rule of thumb:
LTV should be at least 3 times higher than CAC.
For example, if the average LTV for a business is $300 and the cost to acquire one customer is $100, then the LTV/CAC ratio = 3:1, and the marketing model is considered healthy. If the ratio drops below 3:1, that’s a signal to either optimize acquisition costs or increase LTV (increase average order value, purchase frequency, or customer retention duration).
These two metrics are often used as synonyms, although in fact there are nuances between them. So, let’s start with the simplest part — the difference in definitions:
LTV (Lifetime Value) is a broader concept. It shows how much a customer generates on average over the entire relationship with the business. This is an average metric across the whole customer base — it helps you understand whether the business model is profitable overall, forecast revenue, and determine how much you can spend to acquire new customers.
CLV (Customer Lifetime Value) is a more individual approach. It is calculated for a specific customer. CLV shows who brings in more and who brings in less, and makes it possible to act more precisely: offer special deals to valuable customers, run loyalty programs for them, or, conversely, limit spending on those who are unlikely to become profitable.
LTV is convenient when you need a high-level picture. CLV is useful when it’s important to work precisely with different customer groups and get the most out of each segment.
As for calculation, the formulas for LTV and CLV rely on the same logic but are applied in different situations. In this article, for LTV we have already reviewed two options:
CLV is usually calculated like this:
CLV=(Average Purchase Value×Average Purchase Frequency)×Average Customer Lifespan
Given that Average Purchase Value = AOV and Average Purchase Frequency = PF (these are simply different names for the same metrics that came from different business contexts). The formulas for LTV and CLV essentially calculate the same thing — they’re just used for different cases: LTV for an average value across the entire base, and CLV for a specific customer or segment.
In real business, calculating LTV for e-commerce is complicated by the fact that it’s not always clear when a customer definitively stops purchasing. You can read more about this nuance in a colleague’s article “Marketing Analytics for E-commerce.”
For SaaS and EdTech, LTV is especially critical as a core metric of financial stability. For a deeper overview of SaaS metrics, including LTV, see a colleague’s article “Analytics for SaaS: Which Metrics You Need to Track and Why.”
One of the first to popularize the LTV/CAC ≥ 3:1 benchmark for SaaS was David Skok in his SaaS Metrics 2.0 series. This rule is also widely used by venture funds, including Andreessen Horowitz, and in business education (for example, Harvard Business School courses) it is mentioned as a standard unit-economics benchmark.
If you want to learn more about using LTV for e-commerce analytics, go to the article “Marketing Analytics for E-commerce.”